FCA OSHA Violations & License Status in Orlando, Florida

Public compliance records for FCA · Orlando, Florida

Quick answer

Is FCA a licensed contractor in Florida?
A contractor license record is observed with status Current | A. Verify directly with official Florida licensing portals for current standing.

Does FCA have OSHA violations or inspection records?
OSHA inspection records are present (59), including injury/fatality-linked signals where reported.

Is FCA legit / verified from current public records?
This profile does not show a clear pass/fail outcome from current public data alone and should be verified source-by-source.

Official verification quick actions

Use this page for screening, then validate with agency portals before any legal, hiring, or procurement decision.

Company description

Entity verification details

Primary entity name: FCA

Known name variations (search candidates): FCA

Possible legal-entity formats observed: Not available from current sources

Industry signal: Other / Multi-service

Industry context: Other / Multi-service entities can have uneven public-record visibility across sources; entity-name matching and state-portal confirmation remain important.

Why records may be missing

  • Company name variations (LLC/Inc/Corp suffix differences) can affect cross-source matching.
  • Government source publication cycles may delay newly updated license/registration visibility.
  • Different legal entities may operate under similar trade names across locations.

For entity-level certainty, run official searches using the name variants listed above and compare identifiers.

FCA is a company headquartered in Orlando, Florida.

According to publicly available records, the company has 59 OSHA inspection records, and the most recent inspection was conducted on 2023-12-26.

Observed records: 1 license record and 0 registration record.

Screening snapshot: OSHA 59 · License 1 · Registration 0.

Data on this page was last updated in April 2026.

Location

FCA operates in Orlando, FL.

Location context is provided as narrative screening text from the current snapshot.

Screening Signal

Screening signal: Moderate verification priority

This is a verification-priority signal generated from public records, not a legal or reputational verdict.

  • High OSHA inspection count (59)
  • Injury-linked OSHA records (28)
  • License status missing or unknown in current dataset
  • Business registration status not verified in current dataset

Bottom-line screening conclusion

Verdict: Mixed signals: further verification recommended

Direct verification takeaway: This profile does not show a clear pass/fail outcome from current public data alone and should be verified source-by-source.

Recommended action: Run targeted verification for missing or unclear fields before a final decision.

Relative position: Higher verification-priority band (within this screening model).

Who should care and when this matters

  • Property owners / buyers: review this before signing contracts that involve regulated work.
  • Procurement teams: use it at pre-qualification stage to avoid avoidable compliance exposure.
  • HR / site operations: prioritize manual checks when onboarding vendors with mixed signals.

This page matters most when you are deciding whether to shortlist, approve, or escalate FCA for deeper compliance review in Florida.

Typical risk scenarios to verify first

  • OSHA activity is present, but license/registration evidence is missing or unclear.
  • License status is not active, or status fields are stale/unknown across sources.
  • Entity naming pattern looks atypical and requires identity confirmation.

Summary

OSHA records
59

License records
1

Registration records
0

License status
Current | A

Registration status
unknown

Last inspection
2023-12-26

City
Orlando

Last updated
2026-04-09 06:49:42.743108

Benchmark in Orlando, Florida

Average OSHA records in this city dataset: 0.3. This company: 59.

Active license ratio in local dataset: 0.0%. This company license status: Current | A.

Local context in Orlando, Florida

FCA is evaluated against local public-record patterns in Orlando, Florida. In this city sample, average OSHA records are 0.3 and active-license ratio is 0.0%.

Practical interpretation: use this page to triage verification order, then confirm current legal standing on official portals before decisions.

Hiring-intent shortcut: prioritize verified contractor profiles first, then review OSHA context and registration consistency.

How to verify this company (step-by-step)

  1. Check OSHA profile and inspection timeline for recent safety signals.
  2. Check contractor license status on the official state board portal.
  3. Check business registration on the official Secretary of State portal.
  4. Use registration/license identifiers to confirm the same legal entity before contract approval.

Decision guidance

Publicly available compliance data shows OSHA inspection activity for this company, indicating prior workplace safety oversight.

Current records show contractor license status as Current | A and business registration status as unknown; users should still verify current standing through official sources.

A higher number of OSHA inspection records may indicate increased operational or safety-related activity.

Recommended next step: Run manual verification first using Florida licensing and business registries.

OSHA inspections present

Contractor license: Current | A

Business registration: unknown

OSHA records

DateRecordSeverity / OutcomePenalty
2023-12-26Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-12-12Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-09-06Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-08-09Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-08-08Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-07-24Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-07-23Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-07-21Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-07-21Case DetailOpen Wounds-
2023-07-20Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-07-18Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-07-16Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-07-10Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-06-29Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-06-18Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-06-15Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-06-14Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-05-23Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-05-14Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-04-25Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-04-13Case DetailTraumatic Injuries To Muscles, Tendons, Ligaments,-
2023-03-23Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-03-22Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-03-20Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-03-05Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-02-27Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-02-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-02-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-02-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-02-08Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2023-02-06Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-01-31Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-01-22Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-01-22Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-01-22Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2023-01-15Case DetailOpen Wounds-
2023-01-12Case DetailOther Traumatic Injuries And Disorders-
2023-01-11Case DetailSurface Wounds And Bruises-
2021-02-18Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2021-02-18Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2021-02-18Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2021-02-15Summary 300aReported 2 workplace injuries-
2021-02-15Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2020-02-27Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2020-02-27Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2020-02-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2020-02-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2019-02-26Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2019-02-26Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2019-01-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2019-01-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2019-01-25Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2017-10-27Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2017-10-27Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2001-02-24Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2001-02-24Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2001-02-24Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2001-02-18Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-
2001-02-18Summary 300aReported 1 workplace injuries-

Contractor license records

License numberTypeStatusIssue dateExpiry date
-QB - Construction IndustryCurrent | A2000-01-23-

Business registration records

Registration numberStatusIncorporation dateRegistered agent

Business registration records were not observed in the current dataset for this company/state combination.

Record interpretation

  • OSHA inspection records present (59)
  • Contractor license status: Current | A
  • Business registration record not observed in current dataset

Missing records here should be treated as "not yet observed" and trigger targeted manual verification.

Timeline

    Sources

    Source: OSHA public records

    Source: State contractor license records

    Source: Secretary of State records

    Raw source URLs: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4 · Source 5

    Verify this record on government source portals:

    Editorial and methodology note

    Maintained by the Compliance Lookup Editorial Team. Data is aggregated from official public sources and normalized for screening use.

    For high-stakes decisions, official agency records remain the authoritative source of truth.

    Explore related index views

    State overview · City screening page · Quality ranking · Active licenses · OSHA records